ASCEND

Abstract

Current social networks suffer from unverified claims, vanity metrics, and algorithm-driven manipulation. We propose ASCEND, a hierarchical social platform that applies blockchain principles—specifically decentralized validation and proof-of-work—to human achievement verification. The system implements a seven-tier rank hierarchy where higher-rank users validate lower-rank submissions through a distributed consensus mechanism, creating a trustless verification layer for real-world accomplishments.

2. Proposed Solution

2.1 Proof-of-Achievement vs. Proof-of-Work

Bitcoin's consensus mechanism requires miners to solve computational puzzles to validate transactions. We adapt this model for human achievement:

2.2 Validation Protocol

The validation protocol operates in three phases:

1. Submission: User U with rank R submits post P with proof artifacts (images, metrics, documentation). Post enters validation queue V_R.
2. Assignment: System randomly selects k validators from rank R+1 or higher. Randomization prevents collusion and ensures fair distribution of validation work.
3. Consensus: Validators independently review P and vote approve/reject. If ≥ (k/2 + 1) validators approve, post is published and points are awarded. Validation decisions are cryptographically signed and stored immutably.

4. Economic Incentive Layer

The system requires three economic primitives:

4.1 Merit Point Allocation

Approved posts award points P based on validation consensus strength and post category:

P = base_points × consensus_multiplier × category_weight
consensus_multiplier = (approvals / total_validators)
category_weight ∈ {fitness: 1.0, learning: 1.2, wealth: 1.5}

4.2 Validator Compensation

Validators earn micro-fees (0.5-2% of awarded points) for review work. This creates sustainable validation throughput without requiring altruistic behavior.

4.3 Anti-Sybil Mechanisms